Mon, Aug 20, 2018
An Alternative History of Santa Cruz County
This article is part of the MAH's Online History Journal, a collection of original research on local history. Dive deep into Santa Cruz County history in this ever growing forum and start curating your own. Click here to explore other articles like this.
Imagine a 260-foot-high dam across the Soquel Valley, a submarine port at Santa Cruz, a 13-story apartment building on the beach at Capitola, or a giant nuclear power plant near Davenport.
These are just a few of many projects that were proposed for our town, but never built.
Introduction
Santa Cruz County history is littered with such unrealized plans as those listed above, though most are not so dramatic. Had even a few of the major ones come to fruition, our little patch of paradise on the north shore of Monterey Bay would be very different from the place we now know. In this alternate history, there would be more heavy industry, dams, freeways, railroad lines, and housing subdivisions. There would be entire towns that do not exist today. In some respects, what didn’t happen is just as important as what did.
In recent decades, the history of failed plans has increasingly become a subject for study by historians. In the fall of 2013, for example, the California Historical Society and the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) presented a five-venue exhibition titled, Unbuilt San Francisco: The View From Futures Past. According to exhibition curator John King, “Today’s urban landscape is shaped in profound ways by the buildings that never came to life, the plans that fell short.”
What didn’t come to pass nevertheless tells us how certain people envisioned the future. Such proposals frequently prompted not just decisionmakers but everyday citizens to seriously examine what kind of a future they wanted. In hindsight, some of the plans prompt chuckles, others horror. What were they thinking?
This article offers only a small sampling of such projects, which probably number in the thousands. They provide context for some of the issues of the present and future. Many current development issues have roots going back a century or more.
For inclusion here, a proposal has to have been “serious” and not just a casual comment. All of the ones discussed were significant enough to be covered in local newspapers. Some never progressed past the idea stage, while others got as far as plans being drawn or even construction starting. Especially common are examples where a project was built, but in a manner far different from what was originally envisioned. Then there is that rare subset of projects that were actually built but never used.
Imagine a 260-foot-high dam across the Soquel Valley, a submarine port at Santa Cruz, a 13-story apartment building on the beach at Capitola, or a giant nuclear power plant near Davenport. These are just a few of many projects that were proposed for our town, but never built.
Introduction
Santa Cruz County history is littered with such unrealized plans as those listed above, though most are not so dramatic. Had even a few of the major ones come to fruition, our little patch of paradise on the north shore of Monterey Bay would be very different from the place we now know. In this alternate history, there would be more heavy industry, dams, freeways, railroad lines, and housing subdivisions. There would be entire towns that do not exist today. In some respects, what didn’t happen is just as important as what did.
In recent decades, the history of failed plans has increasingly become a subject for study by historians. In the fall of 2013, for example, the California Historical Society and the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) presented a five-venue exhibition titled, Unbuilt San Francisco: The View From Futures Past. According to exhibition curator John King, “Today’s urban landscape is shaped in profound ways by the buildings that never came to life, the plans that fell short.”
What didn’t come to pass nevertheless tells us how certain people envisioned the future. Such proposals frequently prompted not just decisionmakers but everyday citizens to seriously examine what kind of a future they wanted. In hindsight, some of the plans prompt chuckles, others horror. What were they thinking?
This article offers only a small sampling of such projects, which probably number in the thousands. They provide context for some of the issues of the present and future. Many current development issues have roots going back a century or more.
For inclusion here, a proposal has to have been “serious” and not just a casual comment. All of the ones discussed were significant enough to be covered in local newspapers. Some never progressed past the idea stage, while others got as far as plans being drawn or even construction starting. Especially common are examples where a project was built, but in a manner far different from what was originally envisioned. Then there is that rare subset of projects that were actually built but never used.